• ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To be clear, being a troll or a paid actor doesn’t make you someone’s property.

    Ok, I give up, I have no idea if you’re doing a bit. Like I felt kinda confident you were serious, but this leaves me floundering. Purposely obtuse because you’ve talked yourself into such a stupid corner, or just that incredibly obtuse that you unironically think asset means property? Absolutely no way to tell which one it is.

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 minutes ago

      Before I reply to your comment, I’d like to share this link. It didn’t change any of my existing understanding because Linus’s comment already made it clear that this was out of their hands, but maybe it’ll help clarify something for you.

      I realize now that this comment on that post was made before this one (“What’s free about delisting maintainers based on their country of residence?”) by the same person. It’s disingenuous for someone to act like this is about “country of residence” when they already engaged with a post clarifying that it’s because of sanctions against specific companies.

      that you unironically think asset means property

      I unironically think that because it does mean that:

      1. assets plural

      a. the property of a deceased person subject by law to the payment of his or her debts and legacies

      b. the entire property of a person, association, corporation, or estate applicable or subject to the payment of debts

      1. ADVANTAGERESOURCE

      a. an item of value owned

      b. assets plural the items on a balance sheet showing the book value of property owned

      When I do a search for “state asset,” the results I get are all related to property, resources, etc., things that belong to and can be exploited by the state - for example https://www.epa.gov/dwcapacity/state-asset-management-initiatives-documents

      Searching for “asset” specifically I see a tertiary definition reading “A spy working in his or her own country and controlled by the enemy” as well as the wikipedia definition, but that still means “spy,” not “paid lobbyist.”

      just that incredibly obtuse

      I’d apologize for not being well versed enough in counter-intelligence lingo to properly interpret the comment, but even with a proper interpretation, the comment I replied to was still incoherent, so I’m not really sure what you expect here.

      It feels weird to say that it was incredibly obtuse of me to not spend more time trying to figure out what someone meant when they were, as far as I can tell just mad that Linus and other Linux maintainers didn’t ignore what their attorneys advised, regardless of what impact that might have had on them personally, and spouting a bunch of nonsense as a result.

      Maybe I’m wrong, though. If so, would you care to explain how this was a violation of the GPL and/or how all of the 4 freedoms I listed were violated?