In 2024, with GNOME 45, Wayland, and 1.25 fractional scaling, regular DPI displays still look better than HiDPI displays. This is a photo of Discord on two laptops side by side.

The blurry one is the HiDPI display from Framework 13. The sharp one is a regular DPI display from Dell XPS 13. Both laptops.

The difference is even more stark in person.

Even the screenshots from the Framework are blurrier than the screen shots from the Dell.

  • jg1i@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Either set the scaling to 1 or 2 if you want it to look sharp

    2x integer scale

    I just switched the scale to 2x on the Framework and it also looks blurry. Actually, I wanna say the Framework display at 2x is worse than at 1.25x… I can see more of the fuzz around the fonts now. Framework at 2x on the left, Dell XPS 13 with the font size increased on the right.

    It’s better to increase font and icon sizes if they are too small.

    I haven’t tried this, but seems logical.

    Coming from a Dell XPS 13 where everything Just Works ™ , I’m bummed Framework’s choice for display isn’t Linux compatible. I might just end up returning the Framework, the blurry fonts are messing with my eyes…

    • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      Did you make sure to disable fractional scaling before setting the 200% setting? If not, then it’s not an actual integer scaling and it will have the same issues as other non integer scales

    • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Framework’s choice for display isn’t Linux compatible.

      They really should have set the option Make_Discord_Blurry_On_Framework_Laptops to "false" in the Linux kernel.

    • caron@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you don’t like it you can send me the laptop. I’ll dispose of it.