The person rejecting reason is you. Turning the other cheek is not rational. My conclusions are grounded in first principles, whereas your stance is closer to a religion.

Buddy, we are just animals trying to survive. The wealthy lack every transcendental value that makes humans special. They’re more like orcs. You want me to say please and thank you as they destroy my world and poison my family?

Killing the rich is self-defense. This planet is dying. Every oil executive, private jet owner, and wealthy polluter is guilty as fuck.

Also they’re not civilians. They’re not even human, as far as I can tell.

I guarantee you that if the shooter had the power to do that then he would have

You don’t know that. Killing the rich is ethical; torturing them is not. And since the shooter has better ethics than you do, I doubt he’d violate such a basic principle.

You’re the epitome of the cautionary adage that all it takes for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing.

As for your claim that an eye-for-an-eye is somehow bad? Tit-for-tat is an excellent strategy for maintaining successful cooperation.

Lastly, there’s no coherent normative theory according to which killing is bad categorically. That’s simply ridiculous.

The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.

He’s right.

Damn, what are they called?

Well thank god this computer genius is on the scene. Don’t worry, EA can solve everything as soon as they hear about these great and very original ideas.

The fact that this thoughtful comment was downvoted, while the computer illiterate reply was upvoted, speaks to the hive mind on this subreddit. We all detest EA, but this guy has a legitimate point.

Just like those annoying abolitionists, always talking about ending slavery. Ugh. It’s like so annoying, you know?

deleted by creator

Animal agriculture is comically inefficient, produces pathetically small amounts of protein for the amount of pesticides, fresh water, and sheer unimaginable pollution it requires, and to top it all off, it’s nutritionally unhealthy.

The only human suffering that “forced” veganism would cause is having to endure dumb people living longer lives due to better health. Imagine all those steak-eating morons no longer dying of heart attacks and diabetes at age 60. The horror of their protracted existence.

I vote we eat this guy instead of the animals. Everybody wins.