This has been fixed. Check rest of the article.

mm was placed for an legitimate purpose.

I hoped LLMs would be able to help me learn things at first, like a patient tutor I can ask all my stupid questions and it’ll never get annoyed with me

It can do that for school level stuff because that material is present in it’s input dataset in a redundant manner. For anything niche or domain-specific, it will hallucinate or fail.

I believe that when the bubble bursts, education will be one genuine usecase for LLMs.

Looks like the person using it have at least some idea of what they are doing

This is something which I have been saying from a year back, albeit a different form – “I only ask questions to LLMs if I already know the answer”.

They are not supposed to replace coders, but kind of boost their productivity.

This usecase is also quite good.

• It’s not critical; not many people are using QICs
• It’s not hard, but just boring
• No existing human solution

Sorry i forgot to respond to you but your last point is helpful. Thanks!

One needs to trust a game like any other proprietary software. That seems like a good rule of thumb.

Thanks for the detailed response.

I guess if I’m not using Flatpak, the games have access to my entire home directory. Sounds a bit risky, but I trust that Valve is testing the games before releasing the game to the store.

But this seems like a single point of failure.

Gaben pls