You seem to already have half of it. Dschingis Khan has fought slavery and given the debate about nuclear bombs, used violence wisely.

Pol Pot, I don’t know if there is a reason to justify the killings.

Stalin, you can either go the way of his education, which means that his cruelty is rooted in a Christian upbringing. Or you could look at the disclosed CIA Stalin memo that reveals that most of his image is western propaganda. Or you could look at the decline after him and realize that whatever he did (or at least most of it) was necessary given the circumstances.

Oh, I thought it was a self own. Thanks.

It makes sense if she means to diss people with tattoos.

She says “can turn” in comparison to “doesn’t”. That comparison is not balanced.

I thought this was a quote.

As an observation, it is literally right. There is ‘Christian’ as a path of spiriitual growth and ‘Christian’ as a gang. That golden cross is a gang symbol and works as such. Spiritually it would be wooden. Golden, it shows membership of the Christian gang.

Tattoos work in the same way. Japanese know and treat them accordingly. At the very least tattoos of normal people make gang membership less despicable. If everybody marks themselves as non-normal, society changes.

This is not an argument against tattoos. They are just more than a fashion symbol, while those can already be spiritually influential, as many women on diets can attest.

Citation needed. In the age of disinformation, spreading quotes without a source is a sin.

Look closer. At least two of them don’t make the point you want to make.

Dictionary knows only the meaning of isolated words. They have no ground to stand on.

They could have asked why there are nuclear threats. At some point OP would have to admit that the sky is not woke enough and that more non-binary fuss is needed.