Because you are providing bad data and not engaging the provided topic.

I referenced an American stat from 2016 and you falsely leverage worldwide data from 2020 disproves it.

Imagine that the dude here in bad faith continues bullshiting. I’m not going to respond to this bullshit further.

It didn’t require you to be online on 2016.

You could simply Google the stat and see who pops up to read more.

You’re full of shit.

The claim in the meme would be a mathematical eventuality based on what I presented.

You are jumping from point to point wildly while stating factually incorrect information.

Math isn’t an opinion, so you can’t just disagree with it like that.

If you actually cared about the stats I cited, you would already know the movement who echoes this point loudly with studies and data to back it up. The reality is you are looking for an easy dismissal.

Not to mention, pendants who debate the pieces of a meme while admitting the sentiment is true are obviously not working to be a part of the solution. Of course, you think the issue to focus on is fine-tuning our statistics, not the massive wealth disparity that is eating our planet alive.

There was a high-profile political campaign that showed these studies all through 2016.

I dont believe there is a good faith discussion to be had on the topic.

In America alone, the top .1% capture over 90% of all newly generated wealth.

It’s just math over time until the concentration of wealth gets even denser.

I thought 2042 was their 10 year plan or something?