You’re the one pretending that everything is alright because you make the wrong choice under the false assumption that nothing can be done… because doing something involves giving up some comfort and not risking getting injured or killed.
Speak for yourself and your bigotted ass.
You’re trying to dismiss an assertion by submitting a superset of the assertion. Which is usually done to belittle or ignore the orginal point in the argument, which is that a majoirty of those pushing back against CoC also romanticize the old boys group of experts.
You’re trying to argue reality is the same for everyone. But as a CisHet Guy It’s kind of obvious I get treated better than women and it just gets worse from Woman to then any of the LBTQIA+ community.
I am not even white and christian and I can tell the difference. Please don’t try to argue about it being equally bad for everyone if moderation was taken away.
Face with Beard = Corporatism
The point I was trying to make (and I should have made properly) is that paid software has a free tier supported by ads. It being paid is just a trigger that makes me think “are they injecting google’s code in their product”. And if they are then your data IS being collected without your consent or knowledge by Google. (Same goes for any other “ad” provider). Who knows what the google API call takes?
Google adsense collects data.
No man I get the point of paid apps. I don’t think it should collect and sell data. That’s the poison pill with this whole deal.
Then you don’t understand the fediverse my friend. These “clients” are monetizing something that’s free.
Not really. We believe in what we believe. You’re the goblin who sticks on to consistency.
Piracy is a service problem. If you want it to disappear, corporate greed got to disappear.
That’s like saying everyone should let people enjoy their kinks and you come in and say "aha, then pedophilia is allowed, ya?
Ralph Waldo Emerson:
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines." His point was that only small-minded men refused to rethink their prior beliefs.
The conversation is actually about manufacturer greed (w.r.t sale prices going past $1000) and audacity to ask customers to pay that much for a less than perfect (their marketing material, theur words) device.
If we can’t expect excessive perfection then manufaturers should sell it at 70% discount.
I am debating a similie but: A lot of things kind of move around before failing. This moving around can be stopped by holding them rigid.
Depends on which out-of-the-box DE support it
You and the moron who thinks that when some one talks about a comment that feels like it came from a google lawyer also sound like you came from reddit.
Lawyer != law. In my mind, this comment just sounded like it came from a nitpicky lawyer representing google.
Nobody fucking reads text. Its muscle memory. Google trained people to expect the correct result. It’s fucking bullshit that people like you point out “iT SaYs SpONsorED!”
“Wait that’s… comm… no freedom… noo not like that!”