• Darorad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Saying do it without proton or wine in response is insane, it’s like saying “Now do it without your gpu plugged in.” They aren’t native Linux, but who cares as long as they run well.

    The few games with problematic anticheat are a deal issue though.

    • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No, there no equivalent because windows doesn’t need third party interpretors for AAA gaming software

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Delete the win32 API and DirectX DLL files (which is basically all WINE is replicating) and see how well Windows plays your games then!

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’ll delete what my system is having to replicate and you do too, let’s see who can run games.

      • Darorad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I simply don’t care. Games run fine under proton, why should I?

        It’s not even extra work you have to do, steam handles pretty much all of it.

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          You don’t have to care, but don’t expect others not to just because you’re OK with a substandard experience. If you’re OK eating shit that’s fine, but don’t trytell me it’s chocolate when I’m holding real chocolate.

            • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              No, I’m comparing Linux to hershe’s, they’re trying to compare hershe’s to real chocolate.

          • Darorad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Proton simply does not deliver a meaningfully substandard experience. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s worse. I’d bet the majority of steam deck users don’t even know what it is.

            Most games take a slight performance hit, so small you won’t notice unless you’re watching the numbers. Some games even have better performance on proton than native windows.

            Why do you think it’s substandard?

              • smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                So, if you’re really dedicated about playing a game with anticheat that doesn’t natively support Linux, and even dual booting isn’t an option, virtual machines are. In particular, Linux has a feature neither MacOS nor Windows share called KVM, which essentially lets you loan physical components to the VM, giving it full use of them and cutting them off from the host PC. This lets VMs running on Linux compete on a level equivalent to a similar OS, natively installed on the same hardware, and absolutely smokes the benchmarks of Windows- and MacOS-hosted VMs.

                And they can be a pain to set up, but once you get one up and running, there are exactly 3 games on that list that you can’t get up and running, Valorant, CS:GO(ESEA) and CS:GO(Faceit). The latter two of which were recently bought out with Saudi blood money, and the former demands a control freak level of access over your PC to even run.

                It is personal opinions, not compatibility, that keeps me from playing fortnite (Tim Sweeney will never be forgiven for doing his hardest to kill the Unreal series, and fortnite skins being a source of modern childhood bullying is despicable) with one friendship group and destiny 2 (might actually be a good game if it wasn’t designed to be a black hole of money and time that deletes its own back-catalogue of content regularly, Sony pls fire Bungie’s incompetent management already) with the another.

              • Darorad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Oh wow, a nice cherry picked list that goes over the issue I said still needs to be fixed.

                Meanwhile let’s compare what people are actually playing. Of the top 1000 games on steam, 34 don’t work.

                Now how about all of steam? Oh, looks like it keeps the same rate.

                Windows is similar, it’s just old games you’ll run into issues with, which incidentally often work better on proton.

                • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The issue that needs to be fixed is the entire problem. Or did you skip over the first part of the thread?

                  • Darorad@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Just skip over the part where it’s 3 percent of games that don’t work, not 40.

                    Also, please explain how your response makes sense in this conversation:

                    Person: “Linux gaming has gotten really good lately”

                    You: “Try it without proton” (This implies you think there’s something wrong with games running on proton even if they’re working)

                    Me: “Why, proton works?”

                    You: “It’s a substandard experience”

                    Me: “There’s a few games it doesn’t run, but for the ones it does how is it substandard?”

                    You: “Games don’t run” (this doesn’t address your issues with proton, the games that do run only do so because of proton, without it and wine it’d be a million times worse)

                    Basically every response of yours seems like you’re bitter people like something you don’t. Literally every gamer acknowledges anticheat is a problem still, there’s no point in discussing it here. Nobody’s trying to force you to switch to Linux.

                    If you want to actually discuss the technical merits and downsides of proton, wine, dxvk, etc. I’m happy to, but if you’re just going to be bitter about people enjoying things, please seek out a therapist.

              • Darorad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah, they’re benchmarks from a while ago.

                This was already the case in 2018, it certainly hasn’t gotten worse.

          • mat ♀@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Just wanted to add that in my experience, Castlevania lord of shadows was unplayable due to graphical bugs on windows, but flawless through proton (that didn’t need any setup btw)

          • smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            If we’re talking about substandard experiences, then Windows overall is definitely one to Linux once you stop trying to treat Linux like Windows-lite and learn to treat it as its own thing.

            You don’t even have package managers (what smartphone app stores are a pale imitation of), you get motherfucking ads in your start menus, your desktop customisation options are paltry at best and half of them are locked behind a paywall, your OS gobbles RAM and processing power like a stoner with the munchies, it’s absolutely littered with baked-in bad decisions from the 90s, hundreds of millions of devices are locked out of future upgrades, and the amount of telemetry built-in could easily be called spyware.

            Linux may be difficult to learn and have areas with spotty compatibility, but she’ll run on a toaster, is totally free, is infinitely customisable (https://lemmy.world/c/unixporn, alas the subreddit is still bigger but I’m not linking that shit here) and highly modular, answers to you and you alone, and can do an entire system update in the background with a single command. There are many reasons why Linux has pushed Windows out of the supercomputer, server, IoT, smartphone, and now AI fields (and sibling BSD Unix holds sway over mainframes and most console OSes, like the Switch and last three Playstations). Desktop PCs are just about the only place where the Windows marketshare still eclipses Linux.

            • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Cool, well while you’re wondering why your toaster doesn’t have native drivers I’ll continue using the better product. I’ve used Linux, been using pc’s longer than most of the people pushing Linux have been alive. You still won’t convince me second tier is first tier.

                • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I’m not the one trying to gaslight about the failures of my chosen OS. Why are you scared of reality?

                  • smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    My sister in Christ, even Microsoft has admitted that Linux can do things their own OS cannot, and now gives all Windows installations the ability to run it in parallel, to the point of rewriting how their own OS works to accommodate it. WSL2 literally runs at the same layer as the Windows NT kernel itself. They’ve started releasing tools of their own that will not work on a purely Windows system, but require WSL2, in order to even function. All of Azure runs on a Linux backbone. They’ve made their own distros for internal use. And knowing how hard they are going to push AI with Windows 12, WSL3 might graduate from optional feature to absolutely mandatory part of Windows. All the PCs that can’t do the necessary virtualisation were filtered out by the Windows 11 requirements, after all.

                    This from the company that tried to destroy Linux for years, tried to kill it with UEFI, SecureBoot, FUD and sponsoring lawsuits against the Linux Foundation. Why does your vendetta continue when even theirs has faded and been replaced by a wholehearted embrace?

      • Darorad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        There’s OpenDX, which seems cool, but my understanding is it’d have to be implemented in the game not just on a system, so why bother doing that over Vulkan.