We all saw in the news that Simple Mobile Tools got acquired by ZipoApps and they started filling up the free apps with ads.

Luckily, being those apps open source, a new fork has been created.

It’s called Fossify. They forked all the apps on GitHub and they have a new maintainer.

Now we just need to wait for their first official release and then… we need to spread the word and make people switch from the old SMT apps to Fossify!

  • Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thats great. I consider the SMT essential apps to be honest. They are ad free, privacy friendly, and open source.

  • GrapesOfAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is 100% of the reason we need to support open source. How many times has a megacorp bought a beloved software and shit all over it? Now, it doesn’t matter quite as much, we can just move on.

    • Scrollone@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I completely agree.

      Another recent example has been the developer tool Insomnia. It went from open and free to riddled with trackers and paid-only features.

      Luckily an open source fork, called Insomnium, has been created.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The new owners OR f-droid, depending on whether they want to start adding badware or close-sourcing it.

          • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Correct. Meaning it can’t be turned proprietary because if they distribute copies, they must distribute the source code to everyone who gets them, under the GPL.

    • Scrollone@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s an interesting question. For now, the apps on F-Droid are still safe, but we have to see.

      The new owner could decide to pull them out of the store.

    • blubfisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think the new owners can just pull it from F-Droid, I hope the F-Droid team has a code backup. I think they will migrate everything to fossify. With the gallery this already happened, the SMT Gallery vanished from my phone and the fossify gallery appeared. I guess that’s a good way to go, since for now fossify is just the same thing with a different name.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know he paid for the domain name already, but Fossify is a horrible name, it really does need to change to something else.

  • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you got SMT from F-Droid you can go to

    settings ---> manage installed apps

    scroll down to SMT and on each one tap it, then tap the 3 dots in the upper right corner, then check “ignore all updates”. This will keep you on the current version but you’ll be exposed should a vulnerability come to light down the line.

  • /bin/bash/@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont use any of this simple apps but im glad that someones have forked the apps source code and go further with them if i can i will give my contribute im not a android developer expert but i know the basics.

    The constants updates of klotin code and android source code itself gives me less motivation…

    Is not hard to code its hard to keep updated.

    The question here is why some company invests in opensource code to flood the apps with trackers instead of created from scratch?

    The answer unfortunately is simple 10% of all android users understand and cares about privacy and foss apps 90% dont understand or does not care about that.

    That means 90% of android users soon or later are giving for free a lot of privat data to this companies and they can sell and/or use to make profit or booth.

    How can we change this?

    We can’t… there is only two ways to change this and they are not within our reach

    1 on the shool everyone should have lessons about privacy on the internet.

    Which shool take the initiative to start??..

    2 create a law that prohibit companies to colect privat data.

    Less liked to see the light of the sun…

    • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      If someone randomly starts charging me for air because they somehow acquired the rights to oxygen…

      Unfamiliar with Nestle and water? They’d try for oxygen, I bet.

    • darcmage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is probably a silly question but how do you think open source development works and what is adequate compensation?

    • projectmoon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The GPL explicitly allows selling the software, like a proprietary software product. You don’t even need to have the code up in a public repo. What you DO need to do, though, is provide a reasonable way for customers to get the source code, and send it to them if they ask. Just because a project is GPL doesn’t mean you’re entitled to the source for free. Of course, if someone buys it and requests the source, they can do whatever they want with it, including uploading it somewhere. Which in the end, essentially makes it available to everyone. Which is the whole point!

      All of this only works if the owners of the code respect the license. In this particular case, I don’t believe a contributor agreement was ever created, so if the new owners want to close source the apps, they’ll have to get permission from all contributors, or drastically rewrite those contributions.

      But again, this only matters if they respect the license in the first place…