• burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    He was gruff and should have had a beard and looked like a bear, not a twunk.

    I think the beard thing would have been wrong for the time period (that the movie was made). I think beards were pretty iconoclastic and relatively rare for 1991 for anyone under 50 or 60. It would have made him seem like he was old. He definitely should have been aged better, though, total agreement. It honestly looks like someone took a teenager’s skin and stretched it over a ‘perfect’ mask.

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 days ago

      My family photos from the 90’s disagree. There’s even one of my uncles with a mustache in them, and he was like 20 or 30.

      • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 days ago

        Oh, god, yes, mustaches, but not beards. Off the top of my head, 3/9 of my parent’s generation in my family had mustaches. In my grandparent’s generation, I can think of 3/4 having mustaches. One grew a beard as we entered the early 2000s. My dad grows a beard now in his 70s.

      • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        When you say it, yeah, it sort of does appear that way. As if they kept some of the cues from the beast mode, like the super wide nose.