OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agoMean gir(u)l(e)sdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1233arrow-down13
arrow-up1230arrow-down1imageMean gir(u)l(e)sdiscuss.tchncs.deOpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareiAmTheTot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down3·2 days agoI find it very strange that anyone would find something sexual about that photo.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·22 hours agoi find it very strange that anyone wouldn’t find something sexual about that photo
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoIt’s part of a series. I’ve never really seen it from this image but there are others that seem pretty undeniable. But, also, don’t have a speck of sub in me. Maybe it’s just a bottom thing. 👀
minus-squarekabi@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 days agoIf there’s a woman person in the picture, you should assume that someone got horny over it.
minus-squareSnot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·2 days agoYou clearly haven’t been pornbrained by the internet.
I find it very strange that anyone would find something sexual about that photo.
i find it very strange that anyone wouldn’t find something sexual about that photo
It’s part of a series. I’ve never really seen it from this image but there are others that seem pretty undeniable.
But, also, don’t have a speck of sub in me. Maybe it’s just a bottom thing.
👀
I need the rest for science
If there’s a
womanpersonin thepicture, you should assume that someone got horny over it.You clearly haven’t been pornbrained by the internet.