• Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s why the paid services are successful. Another option I heard about is to have a “data buddy” so you both install a NAS at each other’s house, sort out access etc and that’s your off-site.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah. My solution is raspberry pi w/WireGuard + HDD at inlaws. Initial backup was done locally, nightly backups rsync’d over (I don’t generate a ton of data, so it’s mostly just photos from my phone).

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          We “only” have ~35Mbps upload, but that’s plenty since the initial backup was the only large transfer. Daily backup transfers are generally pretty small for me.

          But getting the initial transfer done locally was definitely important for my use case!

            • ferret@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              12 days ago

              You probably don’t generate more than 4 megabits of backup-worthy data on average every second

              • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                Exactly — this is ~10GB every 6 hours (which is probably a reasonable amount of time to run a backup while not interfering with active Internet use).

                Basically the only backup-worthy content I generate is casual photos and videos, and these are nowhere near that size (Immich database backups also take up a bit but I could certainly be smarter about how I handle these backups).