For some reason, I’m reading the “your” here as gendered. Which is weird, because I like to ask my (not terminally online) boyfriend his opinion of online drama, and when I explained to him that women were saying they’d choose a bear over a strange man, he said, “That’s the obvious choice. Everyone should chose the bear over a stranger. People are awful.”
Gendering it was probably unnecessary. If you made the question “would you rather meet a bear in the woods, or a stranger,” most people would say the bear.
The way it was explained to me was that regardless of gender, if you see someone in the woods, there might be other people nearby and they might pose a serious threat to you. Bears don’t really gang up on people, so you should be okay if you keep your distance.
I don’t know whether or not I agree with that risk assessment, but I can see that it comes from a logical standpoint.
For some reason, I’m reading the “your” here as gendered. Which is weird, because I like to ask my (not terminally online) boyfriend his opinion of online drama, and when I explained to him that women were saying they’d choose a bear over a strange man, he said, “That’s the obvious choice. Everyone should chose the bear over a stranger. People are awful.”
Gendering it was probably unnecessary. If you made the question “would you rather meet a bear in the woods, or a stranger,” most people would say the bear.
Because people are terrible.
The way it was explained to me was that regardless of gender, if you see someone in the woods, there might be other people nearby and they might pose a serious threat to you. Bears don’t really gang up on people, so you should be okay if you keep your distance.
I don’t know whether or not I agree with that risk assessment, but I can see that it comes from a logical standpoint.