The OnePlus Watch 2 has 2 chips, and basically runs a lightweight OS while keeping the hungry one in very very low power, and only powering it up when necessary.

I was thinking that maybe such idea could be applied on a Linux phone that could run all your banking apps without Waydroid’s “you-must-be-a-hacker” issues, literally by having a half-asleep Android running on another chip, which you can wake up whenever to do your “non-hacker” things, while at the same time you can run the rest of your system (calls, messaging, calculator, calendar, browser…) on your lightweight, private and personalized Linux mobile OS.

I think I would pay big bucks for something like this, and it could serve as a transition device for ditching Android in the future when Tux finally governs over the world.

What do you guys think?

  • onlinepersona@programming.devEnglish
    345·
    7 months ago

    That already exists with waydroid. It’s what people use on the Librem 5 and PinePhone to run linux apps. It would save much more battery if it were at OS level, but I assume that would be akin to merging Android and mobile linux distros and a lot more work.

    Why do you have the impression that waydroid has a “you must be a hacker” issue?

    Anti Commercial-AI license

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    296·
    7 months ago

    Alternative utopia: do online banking in a desktop web browser while seated comfortably at home, rather than on a street corner in the sun squinting at a tiny screen.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        14·
        7 months ago

        Indeed, this is the case with Revolut, a bank which literally requires iOS or Android spyware to sign up and use. But it’s rare. And a reason to NEVER USE that bank.

    • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
      7·
      7 months ago

      I agree, but if you’re like me, situations arise where I’m not at home, and unexpectedly spending money. Being able to look at my bank on my phone in the moment helps me judge if what I’m about to do is worth it.

      • Para_lyzed@lemmy.world
        2·
        7 months ago

        You can use a mobile device for this.

        I use Bitwarden, so I just have a shortcut in my launcher to my bank’s web browser page, Bitwarden autofills, and I’m in my account in a few seconds. Honestly, it might just be my bank that’s the issue, but their old mobile app took longer to load than it takes me to log into their webpage anyway (and it would log me out half the time). Years ago I thought this would be an issue for me when I planned to de-google, but it turns out it’s a complete non-issue (for me) and in fact I actually like the web page better. I’m able to do a lot of things in the browser that the app didn’t have the ability to access (at least at the time; it’s likely been updated).

        Just throwing it out there that it’s not necessarily an issue, and often the difference between the app and the webpage is blown out of proportion.

    • Peasley@lemmy.world
      5·
      7 months ago

      Pretty sure it just had an emulation layer for Android. I had a Passport when it was new, and I remember the phone was emulating a version of Android a few years old, so a few apps didn’t work properly

      • kuneho@lemmy.world
        3·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, it was already on old enough version when it was a thing.

        But to my understanding, it wasn’t emulation, rather having a compatibility layer between QNX and Android.

        so AFAIK, it was rather like Proton on Linux? but maybe I’m totally wrong here, haha.

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          4·
          7 months ago

          I worked at BlackBerry (many years later) and this was my understanding. They were brutally reimpmementing all the Android APIs

            • Peasley@lemmy.world
              2·
              7 months ago

              I was really impressed with the hub. Such a well-implemented feature. I also miss the led that would blink a different color for different types of notifications or conversations

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    61·
    7 months ago

    I guess something like what you’re talking about or some kind of Virtual Machine to run these difficult apps would be perfect.

    Or the ability to dual boot.

    Basically, I would want to do everything I can on a PC, on a smartphone 😅

    • Decency8401@discuss.tchncs.de
      2·
      7 months ago

      I tried Ubuntu Touch for about a week or two (absolutely broken on the OnePlus 5 btw.) I kind of had a VM of Android on it. I used Waydroid for apps I need, like E-Banking. Waydroid was an absolute mess, it constantly crashed and often played Music via Speaker instead of Bluetooth.

      Edit: I really liked the way, how to interact with the whole os. The habit to switch apps and show the sidebar stuck with me for at least a month after my little experience.

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      1·
      7 months ago

      Multi-core processors already do this. Give the Android OS a Core or 4, the Linux OS a Core or 4(or however many). The power management already works in the suggested configuration as well: High-power cores are put to sleep when not in use.

      The remaining question is whether the hardware virtualization is in place on the specific ARM chip in question to give/confine the one OS(virtualized/parallelized, not dual-booted) a specific Core or set of cores. It could be desirable to give Linux and Android each a low-power core and have them dynamically split the rest, with Linux controlling prioritization.

      There are high-powered Linux apps. Moreso than Android in-fact.

  • qwesx@kbin.social
    3·
    7 months ago

    This should work on Jolla’s Sailfish OS phones as they’re running a legit Android in a sandbox. Unfortunately their hardware support is pretty abysmal if you want all features working - and since it’s legit Android it’s also not free (monetary) and Sailfish OS’s UI toolkit is also not free (freedom).

    edit: also, last time I checked, Bluetooth support for Android apps is terrible, basically only audio work(s|ed).

  • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
    1·
    7 months ago

    Some Android phones can already be dual booted with (in theory) any other UEFI compatible OS. There’s a whole guide on the PostmarketOS about setting up a dual boot environment.

    I briefly tested PostmarketOS on a OnePlus 6T. The core functions seemed fine but overall it lacked functionality, so my plan was to dual boot with LineageOS (a degoogled android project) for the bits that really just want a true android environment to function properly, and PmOS for everything else I could manage. In the end I just wasn’t up for the process of setting up a dual boot, and went with just LineageOS. Been really happy with it so far, and will probably revisit dual booting when PmOS is more feature complete.

    Edit, I suppose this doesn’t touch on the idea of running two separate OS’s on separate chips, and it does require a reboot to get the functionality of one OS or another, but besides that hiccup you’d get mostly the same functionality out of less complex hardware.

    • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      4·
      7 months ago

      This is not dual booting in the classical way. Imagine your laptop had 2 processors, and you could be running Linux on one, while the other processor is dormant with Windows, and wakes up when you launch League Of Legends or something. But then, you minimize LoL and you are back on Linux.